Operating in the Company of Giants
Corbond Corporation is a small company that competes with the big
brand names of the building insulation industry, such as Johns
Manville and Owens Corning. As such, it needs to run like big
companies – without their resources. SAP Business One helps Corbond
do just that. But it actually wasn’t Corbond’s first choice.
Corbond Corporation, based in the heart of “Big Sky Country” in
Bozeman, Montana, develops, manufactures, and markets spray-in-place
polyurethane foam insulation products for the U.S. market. The
material it employs has been used for many years in thermos bottles,
refrigerators, and commercial freezers and coolers. Corbond
developed ways to use it effectively for home and commercial
building insulation. A premium product, Corbond has the highest
performance R-Factor (resistance to heat flow) achievable for
insulation products on today’s market. In addition to isolating
indoor and outdoor climates, Corbond also adds strength to
structures and provides the added benefit of noise reduction.
According to Nigel F. Maynard, Senior Editor for “Builder Magazine”,
fiberglass’s share in the insulation market is approximately 85
percent. “But an increasing number of builders and architects
consider sprayed foam insulation to be a superior product. It is the
fastest-growing segment of the insulation market, and many industry
observers believe that it will soon displace fiberglass as the
product of choice for builders and home buyers.”
This is a big opportunity for Corbond.
Required: a giant size solution in
a small package
Corbond operates with a team of fewer than twenty people and minimal
resources. It’s a tall order to present the face of an insulation
powerhouse on the same playing field with well known Fortune 1000
companies. And while it may not be a household name yet, Corbond has
a strong reputation among architects, developers, and builders.
Ben Ganser, Chief of Operation and Finance at Corbond, says, “A
little more than two years ago we began our process of upgrading the
company’s IT infrastructure in order to do even more with even fewer
people. That’s what prompted us to look for an accounting package to
replace the one we had been using.”
Two issues put Ganser over the edge in deciding to replace the
accounting software. The first occurred when he had to take some
financials to the bank and the accounting team couldn’t reconcile
subledger and general ledger data. “It was very embarrassing,”
admits Ganser.
The second challenge came when the team couldn’t determine whether a
particular customer was eligible for a discount. “After four hours
of digging, we still couldn’t find the answer,” says Ganser. “We
complained to our application supplier who said, ‘Well, we could
write a report for you.’ But that just wasn’t a satisfactory
response.”
Out of the frying pan into the
fire
With the help of a third-party consultant, Ganser and his team
conducted a careful needs analysis, with inputs from all the
company’s stakeholders, and chose a new platform.
It was installed in April of 2006. But within two months it was
apparent that this software was not the right choice. Ganser
observes, “It turned out to be a very frustrating experience. It was
just so resource-intensive that we lost an entire person to
accounting, so other work just wasn’t getting done.” Team members
struggled with having to fix the same problems, such as issues with
check printing, over and over. “Some people were so unhappy with the
inefficiencies of this system that they would have been glad just to
use green accounting pads,” Ganser laughs.
And it was actually costing more money than the old solution had. By
Ganser’s calculations, the old solution had cost $1100 per week to
manage their accounting. And they couldn’t satisfy the president’s
request for management reports. The new solution was costing $2500
per week and they still couldn’t get required information to the
president’s desk. Not only that, because the solution was so
resource-intensive, their accounting department was becoming the
fastest growing department in the company and other work wasn’t
getting done.
Stanching the loss and choosing again
At that point, Ganser happened to speak with a friend who had been
through a similar situation. She observed that for the same amount
of money that he’d spent to acquire the new solution Corbond could
have had an SAP solution. This was news to Ganser. “We didn’t
realize that SAP made programs for companies our size,” he says.
He contacted SAP and was referred to Software Outfitters, an SAP
Business Partner in Eagle, Idaho. Ganser says, “We saw immediately
that SAP Business One is far more than just a data-crunching
accounting package. We liked its strategic aspect.” Ganser made the
business case for the change. “We took a huge write off to do this,
but it was the right move."
Ready to take on the giants
The SAP Business One implementation went smoothly, partly because
the team had so recently re-written the chart of accounts for the
interim solution. Ganser notes, “The data conversion still required
considerable work but our Software Outfitters consultants helped the
process unfold easily.” The system went live on May 1, 2007, just 13
months after the rollout of the failed previous solution.
“We now have the ability to view and manage every function of our
business, and Software Outfitters has written some additional
reports that we needed.” This gives Corbond an advantage it didn’t
have in the past in its quest to take on the giants in the industry
as the demand for sprayed foam insulation grows.
While Ganser hasn’t yet calculated the weekly cost to run the SAP
Business One solution, he says that initial feedback from users is
that it takes far less time for people to get what they need. They
report that they appreciate the solution’s simplicity and its
intuitive ease of use for such things as changing serial numbers.
E-learning courses from the SAP Business One e-learning catalog,
including “Business One Overview & Navigation,” “Procurement & Sales
Processes,” and “Batches & Serial Numbers” helped people get up to
speed quickly.
Calling out a specific vote of confidence, Ganser says, “After three
days, the woman who does the invoicing said, ‘I love this program.
It’s the greatest thing ever.’ It has enabled her to complete her
invoicing quickly and it freed her up to do the rest of her work.”
Bottom line for Ganser is that he can get timely information to the
bank now. Not only that, he says, “I was able to get the president
the best set of financials he’s had in three years. And it’s a
repeatable process.”
Source: SAP INFO |